Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 7681 - 7700 of 9,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:14 pm by Amy Howe
” Breyer emphasized that this is “not the first time people have become discouraged with the democratic process,” and that the United States has experienced racism before. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:46 pm
Thirteen other research libraries in the United States listed in the OCLC Worldcat   indicate that they hold copies of the Alvarez book, so I have requested a copy through  my library’s interlibrary loan service. [read post]
All was fine until the United States Postal Service (USPS) signed a deal with Amazon under which it would deliver Amazon packages on Sundays. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:30 am
This point recently came before Judge Birss QC in the (still misnamed) Patents County Court for England and Wales in relation to whether a substantial part of a book was reproduced in a film script: Hodgson and Jarvie v Isaac and Notting Hill Movies Ltd (2011). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
  Based on the review, historians will learn nothing new, but the book may help a broader readership to reflect on the brutal racial violence that swept the country that year.Another of this week's noteworthy reviews comes from the New Republic: Tamar Jacoby (ImmigrationWorks USA) takes up Crossing Borders: Migration and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century United States (Harvard University Press), by Dorothee Schneider. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 7:49 pm
So I will stick to what I know, which is the Left Side of the "v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:25 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States - Yale University - Harvard University - Education - Colleges and Universities [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
  The fact pattern you describe is very similar to a case decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in late 2005, Rowe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 am by Jon Tracy
The President voiced support for indefinite detention of “people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases, because evidence may be tainted, but who, nonetheless, pose a threat to the security of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am by Lawrence Taylor
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]