Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 7681 - 7700 of 30,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
I think it confuses and conflates different parts of the same process, making it look like a judge has more free reign to tinker with a transcript than she actually does. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
However, the demonstration of a correlation does not prove the hypothesized result and does not constitute scientific knowledge. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
With little useful guidance from the parties, no controlling precedent, and the three-year post-remittitur deadline for bringing the case to trial about to expire, the experienced and highly regarded trial judge concluded it does neither. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
To be clear, choosing one frame over the other does not indicate a preference for presidential interest over presidential abstention. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am by MOTP
In the Note, James agreed to re-pay Moncor $10,690.37 in principal, plus interest, with her monthly payment set at $171.82. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There are other big cases in the wings and it looks like 2019 will be a bumper year for defamation litigation: Craig McLachlan v Fairfax and the ABC, Chau Chak Wing v Fairfax and the ABC, Ben Roberts-Smith v Fairfax, Sarah Hanson-Young v David Leyonhjelm, John Herron and John Gill v HarperCollins – to mention a handful. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
  One of the more interesting manifestations of the role of religion within political life is that of the priests of the practitioners of the old religions of Africa as re-established in the Western Hemisphere, particularly in Marxist-Leninist Cuba. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am by Larry
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]