Search for: "People v Word" Results 7681 - 7700 of 17,916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
This is a guest post by Allan Norman of Celtic Knot following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The Christian Institute and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
Trump as a dangerously unstable figure and a friend of foreign despots like Vladimir V. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 3:58 am by SHG
One of the least understood, and most important, reasons why cops kill with seeming impunity is that people can’t seem to wrap their heads around the legal standard established by Graham v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
I should note that, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by Ron Coleman
Highsmith’s generous gift to the American people,” the complaint reads. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am by INFORRM
CICAD argued that the words did not merit curtailment of its freedom of expression in what was a highly controversial issue in a debate of public interest. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The statutorily stated policy or philosophy underlying FOIL is to promote “[t]he people's right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents and statistics leading to determinations. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Heather Gray-Grant
So a picture is actually worth way more than 1,000 words! [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by bryannewland
Senator Wheeler expressed concern that the IRA would be used by “white people” (his words) claiming to be Indian. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
  The claimant failed to prove that the words complained of had been spoken. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:50 pm by Bill Otis
 Restoring the vote for those who continue to believe (and, often, to act) as if law is for other people, and rules are for suckers, is a different matter. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
’ Further, defendant stated, `There's a lot of vulgarity there, and then people's political opinions, and I felt like I needed to chime in. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
The express wording of Article 15, which refers to data retention, makes clear that data retention is not per se incompatible with Directive 2002/58. [read post]