Search for: "State of New York v. United States"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 16,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Peo's Br. at 8, n. 6 ("New York distinguishes between air guns and firearms. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:05 am
Rameker decision by the United State Supreme Court on June 12, 2014? [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Pursuant to Executive Law § 71, defendant served a copy of his motion on the New York State Attorney General (Haidas Br. at 17). [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Defendant cites no facts from anywhere in the United States outside New York City to establish that American citizens overwhelmingly chose air guns for "the core lawful purpose of self-defense" [915 N.Y.S.2d 811] (554 U.S. at 630, 128 S.Ct. 2783), rather than for sports and recreation. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
Its main argument is that Congress went beyond its powers by specifically directing the outcome of a pending federal court case, in violation of an 1872 decision by the Supreme Court (United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
As the Heller II court did, this Criminal Court concludes that New York's licensing scheme is substantially related to this important governmental interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
Moreover, the well established rule in New York is that constitutional provisions are presumptively self-executing (see Brown v State of New York, 89 NY2d 172, 186 [1996]). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Heller is distinguishable and its holding does not invalidate New York's gun possession laws or regulations"]; People v Ferguson, 21 Misc 3d 1120(A), *4, 2008 WL 4694552 [Crim Ct Queens County 2008] ["the requirement that handguns be licensed in the State of New York is not tantamount to a total ban and, therefore is not a severe restriction' as was the case in Heller"]; see also Mallard v Potenza, 376 Fed Appx… [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
New York City Dep’t of Soc. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
Citing its recent opinions in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:09 am
Board of Education, in which the Court denied to review a New York City policy that prohibited the use of public school facilities for worship services. [read post]
