Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 8:17 am
Moreover, state laws in some cases (such as California, Oregon and Washington) provide as much or more protection to pregnant workers than provided by the PDA and the ADA (see this DOL chart comparing state laws). [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General November and December 2009 – quick links of all the top stories (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents If nothing else, patent attorneys will follow the semantics – machine-or-transformation standard and claim terms (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Nokia - Nokia hurls new salvo in spat with Apple, complains to ITC (Ars Technica) (ITC) US… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States, Ms. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States, Ms. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
California, 589 U. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
European Community, in which the Court is considering whether and to what extent RICO applies outside the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:49 pm
He ruled that the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
After all, "it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule," Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:07 pm
See Rivera v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Witkin, Summary of California Law § 495 [9th ed. 1988]). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
