Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 7681 - 7700 of 44,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2020, 3:33 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Quoting Doe v Marzolf, 258 AD2d 970 [4th Dept 1999], Rich argued that a “subsequent change of heart provides an inadequate basis for vacating the stipulation. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:30 am by Carl Coleman
Carl Coleman Gun violence in the United States has become a public health crisis, with an average of 100 Americans killed by firearms every day. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
” Hodge Jones & Allen had a post “How does GDPR Affect video surveillance(CCTV)? [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:13 am by Derek T. Muller
Pennsylvania before the Supreme Court of the United States, Vice President Mike Pence was not listed as a co-intervenor. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Trump is the current president of the United States, having narrowly won the state of Wisconsin's electoral votes four years ago, through a legislatively mandated popular vote, with a margin of just over 22,700 votes. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:16 am by Berry Law
Culza v Brown and Lay Statements This case relates to lay statements in support of VA claims. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:02 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), which held that the acquisition of cell-site location information was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:02 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), which held that the acquisition of cell-site location information was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
That very question has long been a matter of theological debate in the United States. [read post]