Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 12,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
As the letter from this Wednesday states, “[a]fter reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended section 5000A is constitutional” and “it is also now the position of the United States that, if [the] Court nevertheless concludes that Section 5000A is unconstitutional, that provision is severable from the remainder of the ACA. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:58 am
School of Law, Working Paper No. 34, 2012). [3] DeFazio Press Release. [4] Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
New Mexico, an original-jurisdiction case in which a unanimous court held that the United States can pursue claims against New Mexico for violation of the Rio Grande water compact. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
” “Health Hazard Progress Notes: Compensation Advance Made in New York State,” 16(5) Asbestos Worker 13 (May 1966). [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 7:37 am
United States Liab. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:40 am
United States, 200 F.3d 179, 185 (3d Cir. 1999), the Court of Appeals explained that it was reasonable for officers to handcuff occupants of a house face-down on the floor during a search for narcotics due to the legitimate interests in preventing flight, preventing disposal of narcotics and agent safety. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
V. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am
Comments on the decision by the CJEU in Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd v European Commission (C-550/07) on whether communications between board members and in-house lawyers, seized during a dawn raid, were privileged documents. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:45 pm
IAALS points to a national 2021 joint study – Justice Needs and Satisfaction in the United States of America (published by IAALS and The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law or HiiL) that noted two-thirds of Americans faced at least one legal issue in the past four years. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and Morrison v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:19 am
United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:32 am
United States v. [read post]
