Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 7701 - 7720 of 108,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2008, 12:53 pm
As detailed in this AP story, a "Pennsylvania appeals court ruled Monday that forcing a convicted sex offender to take annual lie detector tests does not violate constitutional protections against self-incrimination. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:58 pm by Riccardo Petersen (ZA)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that if the underlying cause of a settlement does not fall within the parameters of the National Credit Act (NCA), then the settlement agreement cannot logically be converted to a credit agreement under the NCA. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Rio School District, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Apr. 1, 2015), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) reminded us that the doctrine of unclean hands does not apply to UCL claims, equitable though they may be:  Not only is there no analogous case applying the [unclean hands] doctrine to an action pursuant to [Public Contract Code] section 7107, there are analogous cases holding as a matter of law that the doctrine does not apply to such statutory… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:09 am by Sarah Grant
Circuit set oral argument on the government’s appeal in Doe 2 for Dec. 10. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
  * All the federal courts of appeals have held the FSA does not apply to those sentenced before the FSA went into effect. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:56 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  The appeals court in Jane Doe reversed the jury verdict and held that the use of the personnel files in the NLRB hearing was privileged. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir.2014), that a PTAB petitioner that does not meet theArticle III case-or-controversy requirement does not havestanding to invoke judicial power, and thus does not havestanding to appeal to this court from a PTAB decision oninter partes reexamination. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:07 am
Try your adjudicatory skills on these three recently decided appeals, keeping in mind that, by my estimate, about 85% of Section 2(d) refusals are affirmed by the Board. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The trial court at first allowed Doe to proceed pseudonymously, but then concluded otherwise, and Doe appealed. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:54 pm
At least one federal circuit court of appeals has held that it does, and courts have held that other statutes are binding on tribes. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:47 am
As discussed on Monday's blog, the Commonwealth does not have a death penalty, so that is as tough as sentences get. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  He also said she does not have the ability to complete a standard workday at a typical job, including the job at which she was employed. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  He also said she does not have the ability to complete a standard workday at a typical job, including the job at which she was employed. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:27 pm by Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie
 [Page 31].CommentIt is disappointing that the Court of Appeal chose not to address the crux of the appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Jan 7, 2019, Docket No. 17-2003, Published) [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Consequently, it does not comply with Indiana Code section 31-19-9-2(a) and does not constitute a valid consent. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:20 pm by AALRR
  The trial court determined that Metson's workweek was lawful and that Metson properly paid its employees.Although the text of Labor Code section 500 permits an employer to designate "any seven consecutive days starting with the same calendar day each week" as a workweek and seeming grants to employers complete discretion to designate the workweek as the employer sees fit, on appeal, the Court of Appeal held an employer does not have such complete… [read post]