Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 15,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 12:41 am
The distinctiveness of a mark within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) CTMR means that the mark serves to identify the origin of the goods or services of a certain undertaking, and therefore distinguishes those goods or services from those of other undertakings (see Smart Technologies, para 23). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
As discussed here, in a October 23, 2015 opinion , New York (New York County) Supreme Court Judge Charles E. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:05 pm
If, through error, general letters of appointment are afterwards issued to another, the first appointed personal representative may recover any property of the estate in the hands of the personal representative subsequently appointed, but the acts of the latter done in good faith before notice of the first letters are not void for want of validity of appointment.3B:10-23. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:07 am
§ 34:8B-1. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 6:41 pm
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 8:11 am
Observation #9: The design of equipment does not allow proper cleaning and maintenance. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:39 am
So what does this mean for Dr. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:39 am
So what does this mean for Dr. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:10 pm
Thus, common law claims against a former employer for asbestos related diseases are barred, even if the disease does not manifest until after the expiration of the statutes of repose. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
CBS reports that firefighters arrived around 1:15 AM, but the fire quickly grew to two alarms and it took crews an hour to finally extinguish the flames. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
And how does its approach differ from traditional forms of regulation? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
As Lord Neuberger put it at para 23 of Arnold v Britton: Seventhly, reference was made in argument to service charge clauses being construed “restrictively”. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 10:02 pm
Where it does exist, it is very often not properly applied because of lack of public funds for the implementation of controls. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
Although BLM regulations clarify the filing deadlines contained in § 314, the existence of those regulations does not imply that appellees were unjustified in their confusion concerning the deadlines or in their reliance on the advice provided by BLM's local office. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 10:06 am
” 1. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
¶23. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
The government advanced three principal arguments for why §2(a) did not violate the First Amendment: (1) because §2(a) does not “prohibit” or suppress speech at all; (2) because trademark registration is government speech; and (3) because §2(a) merely withholds a government subsidy. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Alex Nypl was a Czechoslovakian migrant who arrived in Melbourne on PROTEA, 23 December 1948. [read post]
