Search for: "English v. English" Results 7701 - 7720 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by abiinniss
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court but the 1765 English ruling by Lord Camden in Entick v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:36 am by Jackie L. Gross
If you were interested in a story we published last fall about Filarsky v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
The matter concerns a restraint order obtained by the SFO at the request of the US authorities over the English assets of an Antiguan bank which was allegedly involved in a Ponzi scheme. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am by Wessen Jazrawi
See also Rosalind English’s post In the courts City of London v Samede [2012] EWHC 34 (QB). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
’s remark that the Duke of Westminster is not good law is incorrect even as a matter of English law. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am by Giesela Ruehl
This article analyses different types of such defects including imprecisely used legal terms (like “damage” when used in the context of the concept of unjust enrichment), meaningless tautologies (like the use of “Schriftstück” and “Dokument” for what the English version consistently calls a “document”), redundancies in different Regulations featuring unclear variations of the respective wording or merely improper translations into other… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:14 pm by Peter Roberts
A recent example of the power of such a court order arose in the case of Nazerali v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Counsel also relied extensively on the judgment of the UK Supreme Court (particularly Lords Mance and Collins) in Dallah Real Estate v Government of Pakistan, which we have discussed here, to suggest that a court must always have jurisdiction to examine matters which are “fundamental” to an arbitration, such as arbitrability of the dispute, whether there was a valid arbitration agreement etc. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:11 am by Gerard Magliocca
Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Golan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:32 am by Sam Favate
In 1982, the Supreme Court held, in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. [read post]