Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 12,870
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
From Ex parte ViolaAs to the prima facie case of obviousness:“In proceedings before the Patent and Trademark Office, theExaminer bears the burden of establishing a prima face case of obviousnessbased upon the prior art. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
It turns out that the unexpected Booker ruling, making the Guidelines discretionary, may save the “in effect on the date the defendant is sentenced” rule from a constitutional ex post facto demise. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
MPEG LA presented its idea to the Department of Justice, seeking ex ante approval through the DOJ’s Business Review Procedure [pdf]. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Il souligne qu’il n’a pas d’obligation d’agir de la sorte, mais qu’il s’agit plutôt « d’une faveur de sa part ». [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Il souligne qu’il n’a pas d’obligation d’agir de la sorte, mais qu’il s’agit plutôt « d’une faveur de sa part ». [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
Here's the main part of the letter (click on the image to enlarge or read the text below the image; I underlined his name):"Enclosed for filing please find Protective Order Subscriptions for experts Coleman Bazelon, Ph. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
While Alan’s excellent post on Tuesday suggested that the FISC’s involvement has already placed courts in the middle of intelligence cases, the ex parte and limited nature of the FISC’s role does not raise comparable concerns. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:01 am
Accordingly, all exclusive grant backs agreements are now treated equally, as excluded restrictions ex Article 5, and are subject to [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 11:15 am
It would probably have helped the patentee if the description had included broadening statements regarding the type of data that may be generated, stored and transmitted. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:21 am
It is very important to look into various stages and issues when the borrower prefers an appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and those are as follows:When the borrower prefers an Appeal under section 17 against the Bank, the DRT can grant ex-parte stay of proceedings against the Bank if there is sufficient ground to that affect from the averments in the ‘Grounds of Appeal’ and also the documents produced. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:21 am
It is very important to look into various stages and issues when the borrower prefers an appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and those are as follows:When the borrower prefers an Appeal under section 17 against the Bank, the DRT can grant ex-parte stay of proceedings against the Bank if there is sufficient ground to that affect from the averments in the ‘Grounds of Appeal’ and also the documents produced. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:50 am
PPLSI has not shown any intent on Defendant’s part to solicit current PPLSI associates…. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:50 am
PPLSI has not shown any intent on Defendant’s part to solicit current PPLSI associates…. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:19 am
If the girlfriend paid part of the down payment, taxes, or any ongoing expenses she may have at least an equitable interest. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 2:36 pm
Journalists and ex-officials have chronicled the role of leaks in their work. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm
With Abraham Lincoln back in the news, the Federal Judiciary Center has posted a series of neat documents about the suspension of habeas corpus and the Ex Parte Merryman case. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
References in this Part to securing that accommodation is available for a person’s occupation shall be construed accordingly. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
References in this Part to securing that accommodation is available for a person’s occupation shall be construed accordingly. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 2:01 pm
But deciding on the "which half" part of that question is surely part of the problem presented by any such proposal. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 7:09 am
This is very ill-advised, though -- while it may not be your intention, your former spouse may view this as harassment. [read post]
