Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 7701 - 7720 of 71,796
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SUNY/CSC [Respondents] appealed the Supreme Court's rulings.Addressing the standing of SED to initiate the action in Proceeding 1, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Graziano v County of Albany, 3 NY3d 475, observed that governmental entities have the capacity to sue only when it is based upon a "concrete statutory predicate ... expressly granted in enabling legislation or it may be inferred from review of the entity's statutory functions or… [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Recently, I had the opportunity to attend an SCC hearing (R v Rafilovich on January 25, 2019) and was amazed to hear the judges and lawyers separately mention or quote the modern principle of statutory interpretation in their arguments, questions, and comments. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SUNY/CSC [Respondents] appealed the Supreme Court's rulings.Addressing the standing of SED to initiate the action in Proceeding 1, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Graziano v County of Albany, 3 NY3d 475, observed that governmental entities have the capacity to sue only when it is based upon a "concrete statutory predicate ... expressly granted in enabling legislation or it may be inferred from review of the entity's statutory functions or… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
There's much of appellate note in the DJ over the past couple days;The DJ's obit for Judge Hug is Procter R. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Kamran Salour
The privacy policy must also state whether a consumer can review and request changes to personally identifiable information and disclose how the operator responds to Web browser “do not track” signals to p [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am by Jim Baker
The attorney general’s perspective on encryption is far from universal. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am by George Basharis
The federal district court in Minnesota properly denied Bombardier’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, the Federal Circuit ruled, rejecting Bombardier’s contention that the strength of its evidence was sufficient to nullify the jury’s verdict (Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. [read post]