Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
But, today, in Sykes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on March 23, 1926. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
He is one of 51 Mexicans on death row in United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Here is the abstract: Professor Mark Tushnet contends that Roper v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:59 am
§ 292, was unconstitutional under the Take Care Clause in Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Institutional level – though national laws render it foreseeable, it is marked by relativism’s promotion of different.? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
Rogers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
This notice is not expedient enough to provide the United States with sufficient time to protect its interests, and is not directed to the Department of Justice -- the agency responsible for representing the United States’ interests in a false marking suit. . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
United States, the Court had the opportunity to clarify the Armed Career Criminal Act (the “ACCA”), the federal government’s version of a “three strikes” law. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
(Cordis) and Wyeth (collectively, Appellants) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Dela- ware granting summary judgment that certain claims of U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
S., at 342 (emphasis deleted; internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Intellectual Property Office (IPO) patent examiner Nigel Hanley opened the proceedings with a concise account of how the IPO's version of Peer-to-Patent (P2P) was intended to work; UCL-and-IPKat Matt Fisher then gave a candid account of the P2P experiences of the United States and Australia. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Law, Baehr v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:22 am
Miguel Torres, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:38 pm
* * * Although Trilini knows or should know of Zip’s exclusive U.S. license to the Troll mark, Trilini nevertheless buys Troll seeds in Russia and resells them in the United States. [read post]
