Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 21,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2018, 11:45 am
Plaintiff alleged defendant property owner had a duty to make sure the vegetation on her property wasn’t going to obstruct the view of drivers moving through that intersection, and that her failure to fulfill that duty by allowing the property to become overgrown meant that she was liable (at least in part) for decedent’s wrongful death. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 5:37 am
No matter the outcome of the case that is expected to last days, the litigation is expected to establish what level of proof a jury would consider sufficient to find a defendant liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:40 am
The plaintiff allegedly filed a case against the defendant city pursuant to the MTCA, asserting it was liable for the officer’s negligence. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:43 am
The jury's verdict specifically noted that the defendants were motivated, in their failure to provide warning lights and other hazard equipment, by financial, bottom line, issues. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
I adopt Transworld's recommendation, grant Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 207), and AWARD Plaintiff $4,900 in total fees and costs.SO ORDERED.EARLIER OPINION ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS BY OTHER DEFENDANTS JANE C. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:06 pm
A plaintiff needs to prove the defendant knew or had reason to know about a danger, but that she lacked knowledge in spite of using ordinary care because of the defendant’s actions or conditions under the defendant’s control. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
The judge granted the Department’s motion as it concerned the Department’s liability for its negligent actions, but denied the motion regarding the Department’s vicarious liability for the actions of its agents. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm
The victim driver’s estate confessed judgment to the passenger’s parents and requested the trial court enter judgment on the claims against those defendants for $100,000. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:28 pm
If Defendants violate these laws, they are liable for the harms their actions caused to the Plaintiffs. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 3:15 am
Earlier this year, the district judge found the defendant’s liable to each company for short-swing profits of $6 million plus pre-judgment interest, currently amounting to a total of $16 million. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:05 pm
For example, earlier this week I discussed the recent Delaware case in which activist investors sought to hold the Disney board liable for the company’s actions regarding Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” legislation. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
The question before the court was not whether Sudan can be held liable; a federal court has already entered a default judgment of over $300 million against it. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
1 May 2015, 1:10 pm
The defendant-employers, for their own part, have urged the court to adopt a “primary beneficiary” test, or a totality test of the six DOL factors, rather than the DOL’s all-or-nothing test. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
From the case: In running a particular advertisement without Vanna White's permission, defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:23 pm
If that employee works five days a week and fifty weeks a year, their employer could be liable for up to $1,500,000 in statutory BIPA penalties in just one year and for just one employee. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
But, even with that caution, Judge McGuire's Order should send a pretty clear signal to the Defendant's counsel that its piercing the veil claims aren't likely to succeed. [read post]
1 May 2015, 1:10 pm
The defendant-employers, for their own part, have urged the court to adopt a “primary beneficiary” test, or a totality test of the six DOL factors, rather than the DOL’s all-or-nothing test. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:36 am
If that employee works five days a week and fifty weeks a year, their employer could be liable for up to $1,500,000 in statutory BIPA penalties in just one year and for just one employee. [read post]
