Search for: "Million v State" Results 7721 - 7740 of 24,662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 1:04 pm
While the indictment does not directly accuse the Russian government of running the operation, American intelligence agencies have said that Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Following a jury verdict in the SEC’s favor, the district court imposed a civil penalty of $2.4 million and disgorgement of $34.9 million. $29.9 million of the disgorgement was attributable to conduct that occurred outside of the five-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:13 am
 The ISP chose to challenge the decision again following the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15 (Tele Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen) (Tele2). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ultimately, the court says that lesser mental states do not support a finding of contributory liability. [read post]