Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Our review of the administrative determination, however, is limited to the grounds invoked by the agency in denying the FOIL request (see Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
"Such extensions of the probationary period may be applicable in other situations as well.For example, in the event an employee injured on the job is given a "light duty assignment," the courts have held that the appointing authority was not required to count the worker's "light duty service" for probationary purposes [Boyle v Koch, 68 NY2d 601]. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 5:23 pm
In O.P. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
’” United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
This has been repeatedly confirmed both by local courts and the ECtHR (P v Poland [2012] ECHR 1853). [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 7:30 am
Final thoughtsArticle 24 of the UPC Agreement specifically states that the UPC shall apply the EPC. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
The ACLJ is planning to file an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
United States District Court, D. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
" Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
Update: Castaneda-Castillo v Holder (1st Cir. 2012) . [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Glatt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
(As Wikipedia explains, a few U.S. states define themselves as “Commonwealths”, rather than “States. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 8:58 pm
Giving life to the concept of "individualized sentencing," EDNY Judge Sifton has ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Three days ago, the United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the federally-backed regime in Cafastan against the latest insurgent assault in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:27 pm
McKee, decided in 1997, (2) State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:03 pm
According to the Court in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
Viewed in the light most favorable to Kaplan, the Appellate Division concluded that these allegations stated a cause of action alleging retaliation within the meaning of the State’s Human Rights Law and New York City’s Human Rights Law, the latter being "more liberal that its state counterpart. [read post]
