Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 8,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 4:06 pm
Patent No. 5,546,448 in combination with ITU V.34 reference, and ALJ Shaw further determined that secondary considerations such as long-felt need, and commercial success supported the validity of the ‘896 patent. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami also outlined organizational changes under consideration with a focus on making the Enforcement Division more “strategic, swift, smart and successful,” including: • creating specialized groups of attorneys along product, market or transactional lines and increasing collaboration among staff across regions; • flattening the management structure of the Division and reducing the… [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Davey Smith, D. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Defenses to Infringement Based on Prior Commercial Use Section 5 of the Patent Reform Act modifies the ability to use certain defenses based on an earlier commercial use in an infringement action. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
On October 26, 2011, Representative Lamar Smith introduced the Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261) ("SOPA"). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:06 am
The Court further ruled the People may question the defendant about the period of time that he warranted in this case and his use of the alias Robert Smith. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:05 am
Using means that highlight the unsavory uses of useful technology is not a solution. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
Manufacturers and the uses of technology are using the same concept now to co [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
John Hemming used (or abused?) [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
A letter from shareholders to the Honorable Christopher Cox, requesting a return to the pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, stressed an important distinction: ". . . between using a shareholder resolution as a back-door device to contest a specific election and using a shareholder resolution in order to change the rules for election so as to further the long-term interests of shareholders. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 8:18 pm
The coursebook we use (one that reflects this viewpoint) may be accessed HERE. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The physician in question also relied upon radiographic interpretations form unregistered and uncertified technicians and radiologists, who had used unregistered and uncertified equipment. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
In West v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
The #MeToo hashtag has been used to refer to sexual assault, sexual harassment, misogyny, chauvinism and sexism. [read post]