Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
While the statements in question may have been made in the United States, they were republished in Ontario and were alleged to have caused injury to Lord Black’s reputation in Ontario. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
As Bill Clinton might say, it depends on what you mean by the word "claim. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
The cert petition in Maples v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:15 pm
But, as Richard Boldt’s thoughtful scholarship suggests (see here, here, and here), the concerns animating drug policy in the United States are complex and anchored in moral judgments that may be difficult to dislodge. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
Notice and takedown is discussed without even naming the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the most discussed and one of the most elaborate NTD schemes, dealing with IP rights in the United States), let alone its strengths and flaws which have been well debated. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
(a) In General- Chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: `Sec. 40130. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:12 pm
Specifically, the bill states that “[i]f the Secretary requires sponsors seeking a [PRV] to demonstrate a good faith intent to market the rare pediatric disease product in the United States, the Secretary shall first issue a guidance document setting forth the required evidentiary support necessary to demonstrate such a good faith intent. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:25 am
Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
Constitution: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
This is second part of Alastair Mullis’ study of the Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
“Although the United States agrees with [Davis] that the question presented is an important and recurring one on which there is a conflict among the courts of appeals and state supreme courts, this case is not a good vehicle to resolve that question,” the Department argued. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
First, the commentary to the bill states in paragraph 13 that subsection (2) covers statements of fact and opinion (including inferences). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:32 pm
Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:14 am
(Zabin v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:34 am
(Zabin v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
We cannot regard that as a satisfactory situation, or think that such a result was ever intended by those who drafted the Scotland Bill 1998 or the United Kingdom Parliament which passed it. [read post]
