Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 12,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
In July 2009, shortly before the re-trial was due to start, the Crown Prosecution Service discontinued the case, and Bento was formally acquitted. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Media Intervenors' Argument Supporting Unsealing Mar-A-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit
18 Aug 2022, 7:42 am
See In re Four Search Warrants (N.D. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 2:14 pm
They’re not levied at a set rate on each financial transaction. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
"We're reviewing the opinion and considering our options and consulting with U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 5:23 am
” If you’re not a Muslim woman, don’t even think about using it. https://t.co/Vkv46VLjWL by @romaissaa_b — NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 29, 2018 Is it fair to call this peak New York Times, a headline that includes a word that no one else is allowed to utter? [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:02 am
Or if you’re at the Justice Department, or some other government agency? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am
I generally tell them that they’re looking at the problem incorrectly. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:31 am
(Ellen Barry, NY Times) The Zero-Sum Myth: We’re Divided, We’re Conquered (Be Antiracist with Ibram X. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:32 am
Department of Justice reported that only five per cent of sex offenders released in 1994 returned to prison for a new sex crime.) [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
According to a recent Department of Justice study, there is “an alarming racial disparity” in police treatment of motorists of color in the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
In the majority opinion, Justice Scalia noted that the First Amendment covers all forms of speech, regardless of the medium in which they appear. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
"They're going to continue going after Mr. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:15 am
” ”And They’re Off! [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Greenfield also objects to giving police more dispute resolution power "because their opinion on who is right and wrong is utterly irrelevant. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:45 am
Nah...OK, before we space dive into the weekend...High Court silent on space law: A flurry of opinions released this week mark the end of the US Supreme Court's term in which the Justices decided 68 cases and surprisingly, not a single one involved space law. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:14 pm
Wade, ending the constitutional right to abortion, longtime conservative Justice Clarence Thomas said in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings that rely on similar legal reasoning, such as those that protect same-sex marriage and access to contraception. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
But as we all know, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, and you’re doubly screwed if that woman is a lawyer and a bridezilla, to boot. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:22 am
" ....One small problem for the respondents, and Bingham McCutcheon's Eric Brunstad, who represents the respondent-debtor; that is, Hechinger was decided by none other than then-Judge, now-Justice Alito, the author of the two latest bankruptcy opinions decided by the Supreme Court (i.e., Travelers & Marrama). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
That issue arose in In re Congoleum Corp. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am
I generally tell them that they’re looking at the problem incorrectly. [read post]
