Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 12,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 8:02 am
Or if you’re at the Justice Department, or some other government agency? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am
I generally tell them that they’re looking at the problem incorrectly. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:31 am
(Ellen Barry, NY Times) The Zero-Sum Myth: We’re Divided, We’re Conquered (Be Antiracist with Ibram X. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:32 am
Department of Justice reported that only five per cent of sex offenders released in 1994 returned to prison for a new sex crime.) [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
According to a recent Department of Justice study, there is “an alarming racial disparity” in police treatment of motorists of color in the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
In the majority opinion, Justice Scalia noted that the First Amendment covers all forms of speech, regardless of the medium in which they appear. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
"They're going to continue going after Mr. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:15 am
” ”And They’re Off! [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Greenfield also objects to giving police more dispute resolution power "because their opinion on who is right and wrong is utterly irrelevant. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:45 am
Nah...OK, before we space dive into the weekend...High Court silent on space law: A flurry of opinions released this week mark the end of the US Supreme Court's term in which the Justices decided 68 cases and surprisingly, not a single one involved space law. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:14 pm
Wade, ending the constitutional right to abortion, longtime conservative Justice Clarence Thomas said in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings that rely on similar legal reasoning, such as those that protect same-sex marriage and access to contraception. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
But as we all know, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, and you’re doubly screwed if that woman is a lawyer and a bridezilla, to boot. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:22 am
" ....One small problem for the respondents, and Bingham McCutcheon's Eric Brunstad, who represents the respondent-debtor; that is, Hechinger was decided by none other than then-Judge, now-Justice Alito, the author of the two latest bankruptcy opinions decided by the Supreme Court (i.e., Travelers & Marrama). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
That issue arose in In re Congoleum Corp. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am
I generally tell them that they’re looking at the problem incorrectly. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:45 am
0396 (DDB) (Justice Guzman not sitting). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Jordan District Court Opinion (April 19, 2023) Bragg v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:31 am
The cynics will see this as more evidence that Harrison Bergeron was prophetic, and it may yet be true, but we’re still fairly high up on the slippery slope, as the stage where homogenizing variables in society for the sake of social justice takes precedence over quality and competence, and new ideas and changes are embraced for no better reason than they’re not the same old ideas. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:59 pm
"This perpetuates that silo approach to communication, and Web 2.0 is about enabling the voice of the people and their opinions. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:02 am
Now you’re a law! [read post]
