Search for: "In re An. C."
Results 7741 - 7760
of 28,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 3:50 pm
§ 924(c). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
Retrieved December 14, 2018, from https://www.babycenter.com/0_how-to-pay-for-your-premature-babys-care-in-the-nicu_10300016.bc Bird, C., & Forman, J. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
Puri’s parents access to the child on Saturdays; (c) granting Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:14 am
To build stronger communities, we have to re-define success. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Subsections (2) and (3) relate to divisional and re-issued patents and a new section 123.1 relates to Certificates of Supplementary Protection. 53. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:46 am
However, an opt-out is not possible in certain circumstances: (a) if the clone has been used in the UK; (b) if it has been licensed or involved in certain transactions; or (c) if proceedings have been commenced relying upon it. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit held In re Sealed Case, 832 F.2d 1268 (D.C. cir. 1987), that due process/minimum contacts limitations apply in the context of criminal subpoenas, as Judge Williams reasons in the In re Grand Jury opinion. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The definition of “week” in section 1 of the ESA should be amended to allow an employer to designate the day on which the period of seven consecutive days begins for the purpose of wage calculation and employee benefits under the Act, provided that the employer must: (a) follow a consistent practice following the designation; and (b) provide adequate notice to affected employees of any subsequent re-designation of the beginning day of the seven-day period. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The definition of “week” in section 1 of the ESA should be amended to allow an employer to designate the day on which the period of seven consecutive days begins for the purpose of wage calculation and employee benefits under the Act, provided that the employer must: (a) follow a consistent practice following the designation; and (b) provide adequate notice to affected employees of any subsequent re-designation of the beginning day of the seven-day period. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm
Introduction Worldwide, there are about 2.6 million stillbirths each year (1), 24,000 of which occur in the U.S. (2). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:33 am
And indeed, the famous Don Quixote proverb ("Tanto va el cántaro a la fuente... [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:34 am
(c) It's been interesting to observe that a number of other countries appear to be intrigued by the idea of adopting their own versions of GILTI and the BEAT. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:03 am
P. 26(c)(1) (“The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Pour répondre à une telle question de partage des compétences, il faut, comme l’enseigne la Cour suprême, déterminer d’abord le caractère véritable de la législation contestée, c’est-à-dire « identifier la “matière” sur laquelle elle porte essentiellement »[2], son objet principal[3], pour ensuite vérifier le rattachement de cet objet à… [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
” (In re United States, 895 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir.2018.) [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:22 pm
Back in November, one of us spoke at a George Mason University event focused on the Russian government’s abuses of the American legal system, on a panel alongside a woman named Jaimie Nawaday. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
(Pix credit here)Especially since the start of international efforts to create a single comprehensive treaty for business and human rights (see, e.g., here, here, and here), states have started to adopt legislation that regulates some aspects of the human rights effects of economic activity. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:49 pm
RMBS Seasoned and Re-Performing Loan Criteria. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:49 pm
RMBS Seasoned and Re-Performing Loan Criteria. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
We're off to the races, i.e., the merits.How far do we stretch the interpretation of a statute to avoid a constitutional problem? [read post]
