Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 9:12 pm
By Andrew Williams -- In a second case involving the Hatch-Waxman regulatory scheme decided by the Federal Circuit on Monday, the Court held in Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:28 pm
., Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:49 pm
KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
See Blackwell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:19 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 pm
Labs. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
Stengel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
In PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:57 am
By Dennis Crouch Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:22 am
For example, in Carrea v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm
Judge Laplante saw through the drug companies’ shell games and got it exactly right in Bartlett v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
Viacom Int'l et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals ruling in West v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Geographical Indications Dev Gangjee Spanish Champagne: labeled as such and exported to the UK. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Thankfully the Second Circuit in Viacom v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:29 am
Critically, even if just one of Vancocin’s labeling changes qualifies for exclusivity, then the entire basis for the FDA’s rejection of exclusivity and hence for approving the generic vancomycin ANDAs is undermined. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
