Search for: "M J.1." Results 7741 - 7760 of 9,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm by Steve Bainbridge
To permit liability based on Rule 10b5-2(b)(1) would exceed the SEC’s § 10(b) authority to proscribe conduct that is deceptive. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Caroline A. Crenshaw
In 2020, 165 operating companies went public via a traditional initial public offering (IPO).[1] There were a total of 248 SPAC IPOs that same year,[2] meaning roughly 60% of all IPOs were conducted through SPACs. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am by Stephen Page
  I’m not satisfied that he has           abandoned all ideas of taking Raja out of the country…. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As time goes on, the Secretary will likely continue to add new designations and recognize new groups of people who may seek an exemption from the Proclamation and obtain entry to the United States The NEW National Interest Designations *Notice that immigrants visa applicants and K-1 fiancé(e) visa applicants are no longer impacted by the COVID-19 proclamations, and instead must be prioritized for interview visa scheduling by Embassies and Consulates worldwide immigrants of all… [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by Schachtman
To that end, Ross Pomeroy, at Real Clear Science, this week offers his views of the best of the worst of 2020 pseudo-science.[1] Admittedly, 2020 has been a bad year for epistemic virtue, but Pomeroy lists eight noteworthy instances of scientific junk. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by admin
To that end, Ross Pomeroy, at Real Clear Science, this week offers his views of the best of the worst of 2020 pseudo-science.[1] Admittedly, 2020 has been a bad year for epistemic virtue, but Pomeroy lists eight noteworthy instances of scientific junk. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:30 am by Colin Murray
In our view Corporal E, Corporal P, Lance Corporal F, Lance Corporal J and Private U fired either in the belief that no-one in the areas towards which they were firing was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury, or not caring whether or not anyone there was posing such a threat; and Private L and Private M probably fired in the belief that they might have identified gunmen, but without being certain that this was the case. [read post]