Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 7741 - 7760 of 36,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm by Jamie Markham
This post summarizes opinions issued by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on June 5, 2020. (1) The defendant could not be separately convicted and punished for both habitual misdemeanor assault and felony assault inflicting serious bodily injury based on the same act; (2) the court must arrest judgment on one of the convictions. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:05 am by Scott R. Anderson, Benjamin Wittes
Twice in the year prior to March 1, 2020, Trump sent 30-day notices to Congress alerting it of “change[s] . . . made to the legal and policy frameworks” pursuant to § 1549(b)—the events that he is obligated to disclose in the unclassified portion of the missing March 1 report under § 1549(c). [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:00 am by Matthew J. Aiesi, Amanda L. Minikus
Eleven Iranian-flagged vessels executed “dangerous and harassing approaches” directed at U.S. ships in the Arabian Sea on April 15. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:40 pm by John C. Manoog III
To speak to an experienced personal injury lawyer about your case, please call the Law Offices of John C. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:23 pm by Larry
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:45 am by Léon Dijkman
Much like proceedings before the CJEU, the opinion is not binding on the Supreme Court, which will decide on the matter independently after taking note of the Advocate-General's opinion and parties' responses to it. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, there is the matter of physicians reading the same X-ray in two, inconsistent ways. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:27 am by Barry Barnett
   Subject-matter-wise, the courts: spoke on 7 IP issues, dealt with securities and pension claims in 4, decided arbitration questions in 3, considered commercial contract claims in 2, upheld 1 big price-fixing jury award, and resolved 1 case each involving (a) Article III standing, (b) punitive damages, (c) removability of some kinds of nuisance cases, (d) res judicata, (e) the appointments clause, (f) preemption, and a (g) copycat class action. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential… [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Accepting the “tainted” evidence generated by the unlicensed practice of medicine would contravene public policy.[12] Although the challenged physician had committed a criminal offense under Washington law, Judge Armstrong did not refer the matter to the King County prosecutor. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:45 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  In that case, because EPA chose as a matter of policy to characterize the product as a new active ingredient, it was required to make a “public interest” determination under FIFRA Section 3(c)(7)(C). [read post]