Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
In so doing, the court relied on the Division Bench[1]Novartis AG v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
AIPLA Peter Sullivan of Foley Hoag filed the AIPLA brief. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:31 am
[IWE] Why Lisp macros are cool, a Perl perspective Ben Tilly iwe@warhead.org.uk Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:40:44 -0700 MJD is one of the well-known Perl hackers. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
BAILII: Recent Decisions Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA [2012] EWCA Civ 838 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Entrust Pension [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
#IPBC DuncanBucknell Sure - v different models, regulation, etc - RT @DuncanBucknell: Are the IP issues completely different in green tech vs pharma? [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
This appeared to be a settled approach and is in line with the approach taken by Henry Carr J in Evalve v Edwards Lifesciences [2019]. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:53 am
Kings County Supreme Court Justice Peter P. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
Roy Greenslade and Peter Preston discuss these developments in The Guardian. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
The first word on the matter was Judge Neal Peters McCurn in Indium Corp. of America v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
” Giles v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Feng, Peter, Stephen D. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Peter. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
They referred to the recent decision of Mohamed and CF v SSHD (2014) a case which sought to quash the claimants’ control orders and TPIMs. [read post]