Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 7741 - 7760 of 29,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 3:13 pm by Brad Pauley
Tenet Healthcare Corp. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 1055, the Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight, affirmed an order denying class certification. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:52 pm by Brad Pauley
  The Court  of Appeal, Second District, Division Three, held in a published opinion, County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 2:21 pm
The "whistleblower" Rigsby sisters were rebuffed today in their appeal of a December 2006 preliminary injunction by federal district court Judge William Acker, who had ordered them to return thousands of pages of claims files they took from a E.A. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:22 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration Law BIA Lacks Authority to Issue Removal Order In First Instance Absent IJ Decision to That Effect NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Probable Cause Defined as 'Reasonable Belief' In Sex Offender's Civil Management Hearing Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITSocial Services Law State Agencies Relieved of Liability for City's Shortcomings in Implementing Welfare Reforms Reynolds, plaintiffs-appellees v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:20 pm
” In November, the district court ruled against MSG’s request for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:42 pm
” In November, the district court ruled against MSG’s request for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
The challengers then appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and also asked for a temporary injunction, but the Second Circuit refused to issue one while they consider the case. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:35 am
Bd. of County Comm., Hot Springs, WY Citation: 2008 WY 110 Docket Number: S-08-0053 Appeal from the District Court of Hot Springs County, the Honorable Gary P. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:58 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The stay arose as a result of a ruling made last month by the 3rd District Court of Appeal in California. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The bottom line of the CAFC decision: Accordingly, this court affirms the district court’s grant of summary judgment of nonobviousness in favor of Unigene, affirms the district court’s denial of summary judgment of obviousness, affirms the district court’s denial of Apotex’s crime-fraud motion, and affirms the district court’s dismissal of Apotex’s new claims and defenses. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The bottom line of the CAFC decision: Accordingly, this court affirms the district court’s grant of summary judgment of nonobviousness in favor of Unigene, affirms the district court’s denial of summary judgment of obviousness, affirms the district court’s denial of Apotex’s crime-fraud motion, and affirms the district court’s dismissal of Apotex’s new claims and defenses. [read post]