Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7741 - 7760 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:42 pm by abiinniss
This is a useful mechanism which provides for the use of mediation and arbitration as fast , cost effective , and less painful methods of solving problems ;and which are used successfully in the United kingdom and The United States of America to resolve issues in every sphere of civil law with huge degrees of success. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
This means that, between 1998 and 2018 no new works entered the public domain the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The following is a short review of the amicus briefs that have been filed in the case.[3] United States Government When the United States government files and amicus brief, that brief is usually seen as the most important amicus brief in the case. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:19 pm
By Mike Dorf Last week, in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
” The significance of Project Mercury to the security of the United States was recognized by giving the program “highest national priority” status. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926), after centuries in which a profoundly different understanding of the doctrine was prominent. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:32 pm by James Yang
You can certainly copy your original patent application, modify or tack onto the back end of the original application any new features for refilling with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am by Wells Bennett
If accepted by the commission—or, on appeal, by either the United States Court of Military Commission Review (“USCMCR”) or the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 690 F.2d 1368, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:04 am by Benjamin Wittes
The main problem with Guantánamo, we suggested, was not that the United States was detaining people as “enemy combatants” but that it was not detaining the “right people. [read post]