Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 7741 - 7760 of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by David Zaring
The securities industry initially brought the case Lucia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:13 am by Walter Olson
Starting in the 1960s a wave of foundation-backed lawsuits (Wyatt v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:44 pm by Sandy
In Fox Television Statements, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
However, the Court stated that the wide ambit of these sections could be managed by: (i) the prosecution only adding parasitic counts to substantive ones where there was a proper public purpose; and (ii) courts using their powers to discourage inappropriate use of the POCA Provisions to prosecute conduct which is sufficiently covered by substantive offences. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:16 am
Disqualifying an individual who has intentionally made a false statement of any material fact in his or her application for public employment United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:43 am by Emily Chan
States can vary among respective requirements of a board of directors but the general idea is the same: there must be a board of directors that serves as the ultimate governing body of the corporation. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
   The crucial evidence was that of Ms Barber concerning her state of mind when she wrote the words complained of. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Accordingly, the court decided that substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that Littles did not sustain an accidental injury arising out and in the course of her employment.In contrast, in Neacosia v New York Power Authority, 85 NY2d 471, the Court of Appeals decided that an employee who was injured after he stopped on his way home to leave his work uniform at a cleaning shop was acting within the scope of his employment and thus was eligible for workers'… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
§2019.020(b) (pdf) which gives the court the power to establish the sequence and timing of discovery for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice and Lu v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
“[A]ll men would be tyrants if they could,” she wrote, declaring the need to check their power. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The first case the court cites Marbury v Madison, which is one of the first cases that every law student in this country studies because it is the first case in which the United States Supreme Court explained the boundaries of its jurisdiction and the importance of the separation of powers. [read post]