Search for: "Story v. State"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 17,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 1:36 am
There seems to be little chance of IPSO finding such a breach, following its rulings in Littler v Sunday Express, and Elton-Campbell v Daily Mail. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
In Plantagenet Alliance Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] EWHC 1662 (QB), a fascinating judgment, the court explored Richard’s lineage in some considerable detail. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:39 am
In other news: Miller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:15 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
The novel tells the story of a family who came from the north of Portugal and emigrated to the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Pregis Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:40 am
Here is a story about a Nissan Leaf used in Kingsport, TN. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
One would think that this would be the end of the story. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:41 am
Samsung at this stage) hear about such rulings, bad news for Apple's European patents may also, not as the most important factor but as another piece of the puzzle, dissuade American jurists from buying Apple's innovator v. copycat story. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am
In Young v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:25 am
The board reasoned that Stephen’s agreement with Family Dollar prohibited Mamie from seeking death benefits, as her claim was derivative of his.The Court of Appeals disagreed and vacated the board's decision on Friday based on a state Supreme Court case from 1930, called Brashear v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
So what if the stories are skewed? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:58 pm
The outcome in Stryker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
FEC & and McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
Just another, typical chapter in the story of a family business divorce. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:17 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
