Search for: "IN RE B E S"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 7,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
E. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:35 am
Básicamente expuso la sección respectiva del proyecto de Código Penal, que ahora vemos de muy difÃÂcil tratamiento parlamentario. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Little has changed since Judge Posner's assessment. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
S? [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Despite these regular military actions, the Pentagon implausibly claims that “[w]e’re not in an armed conflict with the Houthis. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:29 am
En mi opinión, una decisión que no respeta estos criterios no está protegida por el ámbito discrecional que el CGPJ dispone, e incurre en arbitrariedad, y, eso, no otra cosa, es lo sucedido. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The confiscation order’s interference with Art. 1 Protocol 1 The first step of the ECtHR’s analysis required the assessment of whether the Getty Trust could claim a proprietary interest in Victorious Youth in the first place and whether the confiscation measure could interfere with such right. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
SUPPLEMENT: Law360 published an article about this case in which they quoted my comments about the importance of the High Court’s opinion. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:25 am
Qualifications Education/Experience Requirements: Bachelor’s degree in political science, government or a related field is required. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
OCR’s definition of “Sport” The OCR’s criteria are as follows: (1) athletic ability; (2) athletic competition; (3) preparation similar to other athletic teams; (4) multi-level championship competitions; and (5) administration by an athletics department.[18] If a cheerleading squad selects it’s members according to their athletic ability, makes it their… [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
" and that "everyone will blow their brains out if you're still the mayor. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
” (B) Risks to the Justice System What (if any) do you view as the greatest risk to our justice system at the moment? [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
[Wearing improvised masks in public will help defeat the viral invasion] Fast reduction of the COVID-19 pandemic is necessary for public health, re-opening the American economy, restoration of rights and liberties, and prevention of large second or third waves. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Macreath (aged 60), who’s firm Levy Mcrae ‘represents’ or ‘advises’ much of Scotland’s media and also counts among its clients former Lord Advocate now Dame Elish Angiolini DBE QC, née McPhilomy and former Glasgow City Council Boss & Cocaine addict Steven Purcell, had raised a Judicial Review against the Law Society of Scotland’s findings of SEVEN COUNTS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT and FIVE COUNTS OF INADEQUATE… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 4:05 pm
Decía el jurista romano Ciceron aquello de “tota res vacillat et claudicat” ( todo el sistema vacila y cojea un poco) y es evidente que al igual que los aviones tienen eso que se llama “fatiga de vuelo” (las partes mas sólidas se debilitan a largo plazo), nuestro Estado autonómico pide a gritos una revisión para ajustarse las nuevas coordenadas jurídicas, económicas y sociales. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think such closed-mindedness is unfortunate and counterproductive, and if we don’t stop to understand what others are saying—even when we don’t like it—we’re doomed forever to talk past each other. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
(See: Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edition, Pages 1377 and 996). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Attorneys' Manual cannot create substantive rights for the defendants; and 2) the district court abused its discretion when it failed to consider or allude to any prejudice caused by the government's failure to abide by District of Puerto Rico Local Rule 144.2(b). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), questioned whether the Directive and the EU Commissioner’s Decision needed to be re-evaluated in the light of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and whether the Commissioner could look beyond or otherwise disregard the Community finding. [read post]
