Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 7761 - 7780 of 28,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Pork Producers Council v Karen Ross on Oct. 11. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
”  The jurisdictional statement in Republican National Committee, et al., v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
  But does that mean that the state is entitled to immediately crush your car or kill your dog? [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:39 am
Let's look at Kaul's legal arguments:First, after Roe, Wisconsin passed a series of laws to regulate lawful abortion that are directly inconsistent with the 19th century ban. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
  If that change shuts out the legislature, more  or less entirely, that could be a constitutional problem, or so it appeared during the argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am by Karen Gullo
For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-marin-county-sheriff For more on ALPRs:https://www.eff.org/pages/automated-license-plate-readers-alpr Contact:  press@aclunc.org [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
There is no interpretation of "post-acceptance" or "retroactive" that fits a law passed in 2010 that gives states notice that the requirements for eligibility would change FOUR years later, and no additional money from the states would be needed for several years after that. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:46 pm
Lesley Stedman Weidenbener of the Louisville Courier Journal reports today on a case to be heard Monday, June 16th, at 1:00 PM before the Indiana Supreme Court, State of Indiana v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:18 am by Ettinger Law Firm
In 2012, the United State Supreme Court dealt with rights of a posthumously conceived child to the Social Security survivor’s benefits of the deceased parent in Astrue v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:00 pm
It’s worth noting that in his December 2016 ruling, Judge Viken cited the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Brett S. Theisen
That decision invalidated an earlier law, passed in 2010, that granted the same direct-to-retailer-and-consumer privileges to New Jersey growers, but at the expense of out-of-state wineries. [read post]