Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 8,568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 12:26 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:43 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 9:13 pm
"In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:08 am
Datascape, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
Answering all of these "difficult questions at the core of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence" in the negative (and suppressing all seized evidence) in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:34 pm
This sentiment, however, was not shared by the majority of the panel.In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:20 pm
See Sossamon v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:09 pm
Fitzgerald v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
The state also relied on comments the Supreme Court made (not necessary to the decision) in Knowles v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The United States has the programs to deny trade benefits. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
State of New York Div. of Hous. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
Fortenberry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
State Bd. of Education (1982) 32 Cal.3d 779, 795; Bozung v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
R U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 26, 2008 Cooper v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 8:41 pm
§3745.72(B)): Prompt disclosure Reasonable effort to achieve compliance as quickly as practicable Cooperate with the State Agency who is charged with investigating the disclosure Disclosure not required by law, prior litigation, or a prior order The company disclosing has no knowledge or reason to know of an Agency had previously commenced an investigation or enforcement action regarding the violations What is involved in filing a disclosure to the… [read post]
