Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7761 - 7780 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 12:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
After the Supreme Court’s decision fourteen months ago in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am by Amy Howe
Crown Kosher Super Market, a Free Exercise Clause challenge to Sunday closing laws. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am by Wells Bennett
To solve the problem, the United States needs a way to identify unknown terrorists, who might be communicating and conspiring with the known ones. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
In January 2010 he was promoted to an FMLA coordinator position and in 2011 he transferred to a facility in another state. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
 Noriega said that the game portrayed him as a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state, and that it had damaged his reputation. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
After Louis Colon–Gentile was charged “in a seven-count indictment with distribution, receipt, and possession of child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code §§ 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(4)(B), 2252(b)(1) and  2252(b)(2)”, he moved to suppress “physical evidence and statements he made, on the ground that they were obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:39 am by Bill Marler
Persons with Shigellosis in the United States rarely require hospitalization. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, it will be confronting the federal criminal law that has become the favorite of prosecutors each time they begin to build a case about terrorist crimes. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
For example, Article 33.4(c) of the Administrative Services Unit’s collective bargaining agreement between the State and the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., for the period 2011-2016 provides: “Unless both parties agree, the proceedings in disciplinary arbitrations should not be tape recorded. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:00 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Quicken Loans, Inc., the United States Supreme Court ruled that RESPA section 8 does not prohibit a single party from marking up the cost of a settlement service. [read post]