Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 7761 - 7780 of 44,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Solicitor General, who obviously has an interest on behalf of the United States in seeing to it that the provisions of the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 11:11 am
United States, Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Thomas, persuasively disparaged Holland  (and his critique went unanswered, because the majority opinion decided the case on statutory grounds). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Newsflash: Brazil spied on the United States, among other countries, about a decade ago. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:56 am
  Section 798(a)(3) states that[w]hoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information ... concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
The judge says the SAD Scheme “is the most efficient way to address the epidemic of counterfeit goods being sold in the United States on the internet by defendants located outside the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:47 am by zshapiro
Section One states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 1295(a)(1) (stating that this court has jurisdiction “of an appeal from a final decision of a district court of the United States . . . if the jurisdiction of that court was based, in whole or in part, on section 1338 of this title . . . . [read post]