Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 11,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2009, 10:36 pm
’s  Class Action Litigation Reporter (available by  subscription) tipped me off to three interesting class action-related cases  pending before the United States Supreme Court: 1) Morrison v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:33 pm by WIMS
      Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:35 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Carter National Whistleblower Center’s amicus brief, Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by Steven Cohen
Fort Sumter Tours Inc et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – February 1st, 2016 – This case involves a personal injury, which occurred when the Plaintiff was on board a ship owned by the Defendant. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s the intro from a Latham memo on the decision: On May 24, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh […] [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:10 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Edible Arrangements, LLC United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division August 27, 2020, Filed Case No. 3:20-cv-00479   Reporter 2020 U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Holdings Inc and Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: The Adoption by International Tribunals of a Substantive/Transactional Approach to Res Judicata—A New Paradigm in International Dispute Resolution? [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
In a complex action involving the estates of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos as plunderers of Philippine assets, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. v. [read post]