Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 10,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2006, 3:24 pm
Continuing its amazing work as the Blakely frontier, today in Smart v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:09 am
In Matter of Aliperti v Trotta, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven denied an area variance for the size of a home after it had previously granted the same variance for the adjoining parcel several years earlier. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:09 am
In Matter of Aliperti v Trotta, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven denied an area variance for the size of a home after it had previously granted the same variance for the adjoining parcel several years earlier. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:27 am
Haas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Shakbazyan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
The caption: SINGER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.; LIVE GOLD OPERATIONS, INC., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:04 pm
As such, the arbitrator was bound to consider and apply the relevant contractual provisions defining the duties of the employees. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:18 am
That was the case that Judge Jordan concurred (with Judge Pryor) and asked for en banc argument:We are bound by our decision in Mays v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
(See Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
But equity is not bounded by writ. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:33 am
Oberstein v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Ct. at 1011, but placed narrower bounds to its meaning. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
As an initial matter, this court is not bound by the definition of materiality in PTO rules. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:29 am
The Iowa Supreme Court today ruled in Galloway v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 6:01 am
The 9th found that the act was not bound by a state statute of limitations, and so the federal government can collect at any and all times. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:51 am
In the case, called Creditone, LLC v Fang Mei Feldman, the defendant Ms. [read post]
