Search for: "Brand v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 6,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter would still permit brands and celebrities to publish (and maybe Eugene, but not me). [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 11:21 pm
Indeed, if V-8 vegetable juice ever considers a brand extension into chewing gum (how likely is that?) [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am by Paul
The UK Government/Intellectual Property Office: Ambush marketing generally occurs when one brand pays to sponsor a large-scale event (usually a sporting event) and a rival brand attempts to associate itself with the event. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm by Paul
The UK Government/Intellectual Property Office: Ambush marketing generally occurs when one brand pays to sponsor a large-scale event (usually a sporting event) and a rival brand attempts to associate itself with the event. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:51 am by Nancy Prager
Especially since like most contracts, there is a strong likelihood that if you end up litigating a Creative Commons brand license in the United States it will be enforced. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
In May of 2017, the United States Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm by Eric Goldman
Perfect 10 ruling, the court cleans out all of the state law claims (unfair competition, state trademark infringement, tortious interference, negligence and unjust enrichment) due to Section 230. [read post]