Search for: "C. King v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Second Department Justice Marc C. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
[C]ourts and the FDA have recognized the propriety and potential public value of unapproved or off-label drug use.United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Notes for C. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
By J Lokulo-Sodipe & A Osuntogun The Sexual Orientation of a Parent as a Factor when Considering Care By C Feldhaus & C van den Heeve A Human Rights-Based Approach to Poverty Reduction: The Role of the Right of Access to Medicine as an Element of the Right of Access to Health Care By BZ Straus & D Horsten The Impact of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 on the Enforcement of a Mortgage Bond: Sebola v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd… [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
In Matter of Dunn, Lake v M.P.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Division of Power: (a) Executive; (b) Legislative; (c) Judicial --U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
King v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:02 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
In Walker v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:42 pm
As I have explained elsewhere, in Chisholm v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
§ 1225-C [2][A]). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm
Additionally, nowhere in the record did the defendant explicitly state that he waived his right to appeal. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
ROBERTS v. [read post]
