Search for: "Cherry v Cherry" Results 761 - 780 of 1,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Emson also argued that the skilled person would find McDonald confusing in various different ways, and, for example, that the Judge had cherry-picked the parts of McDonald which support obviousness while ignoring all the inconvenient difficulties with the details, but these arguments were all also dismissed by Arnold LJ. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
PR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 988 (11 August 2011): Court of Appeal considers application of “some other compelling reason” test for 3rd bite of cherry immigration appeals Connelly, Re Judicial Review [2011] NIQB 62 (5 August 2011): Northern Ireland High Court rejects UK court’s decision in Hookway (96 hour detention on bail case), says court “failed to recognise the context within… [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
Noteworthy costs awards were recently released in Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 232 v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
 Next Dominic Adair (Bristows LLP) complained very politely about the steps which, following MedImmune v Novartis, patent litigators take to try to minimise hindsight bias when working with experts. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Art V of the US Constitution, for example, imposed a complete ban on amendments of Art I s 9 cl 1 and 4 until 1808. [read post]