Search for: "Commitment of M B" Results 761 - 780 of 3,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 9:30 am by Allison Tussey
The maximum statutory penalty for each count of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; and 17 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:46 pm
B to Reply Br., at 1 (emphasis added).If the Court truly felt this was the case, then I'm confused why the opinion was not simply issued on statutory grounds (and thus avoiding the constitutional question).It's not that I don't find the Court's 8th Amendment analysis to be interesting and well argued; I just wonder why the judge didn't limit her ruling to statutory grounds by holding that the mandatory minimum didn't apply to Farley. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:34 pm
Code § (b), and a host of other federal crimes. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office, 1201 Roundtable, DCJames Madison Building, Mumford RoomNB: I won’t be here tomorrow because the Office had the temerity to schedule the roundtables after I committed to a different exiting roundtable, this one at Notre Dame on deception. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:48 am
  On May 16, the court issued a ruling that suggests a majority of the justices is committed to a rather expansive view of the state ERA. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
When people commit fraud, they use different language. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 2:22 pm by Buce
  Well, I suppose I could add  Roger B. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:21 am
 By contrast, Scenario B is not problematic at all, because there Edwards himself lacks the requisite mental state to commit a crime. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Unknown
Look at the wording and tell me I'm wrong./1The statute now has this language added to it:760.10 Unlawful employment practices. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:59 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I hope I'm wrong, but it seems hard to believe such a small bureaucratic change could make a huge dent in a problem rooted deep in the human psyche. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:06 pm by Daniel Shaviro
., 15%, 5%, or even 0%) to each other’s residents.4) Anti-“double taxation” rules– I’m putting “double taxation” in scare quotes here for a reason. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:01 am
Like I said, I’m going down the Board Specialization list of names one by one and sending pretty much the same email. [read post]