Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 761 - 780
of 14,559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2017, 1:14 pm
The Court’s decision in Cotton & Company, LLP v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
But U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:10 am
Discussing the AI, the court explained: The 2010 AI relies on a District of Minnesota decision, Casas v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
The California Court of Appeal, in Horsford v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 11:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has finalized its rule formalizing the interim Director Review process the Office has been following for Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions under the America Invents Act (AIA) since the Supreme Court’s Arthrex v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 11:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has finalized its rule formalizing the interim Director Review process the Office has been following for Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions under the America Invents Act (AIA) since the Supreme Court’s Arthrex v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:47 pm
In an amicus brief [here] filed with the Supreme Court last Friday in Sandifer v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
In Franks v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
Leon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
Leon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 NY2d 542 and Baer v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 291. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 NY2d 542 and Baer v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 291. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm
Patent and Trademark Office . . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The Circuit Court said that State law governs the preclusive effects of a state administrative agency’s quasi-judicial findings in a federal court and New York courts give quasi-judicial administrative fact-finding preclusive effect where there has been a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:16 am
On November 7, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:07 am
The Court of Appeals holds that a plaintiff who wants to sue the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for retaliation over his whistleblowing cannot do so because he did not initially file an administrative complaint under the Whistleblower Protection Act.The case is Chinniah v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
Department of Justice Solicitor General’s office filed a certiorari petition on behalf of the SEC asking the Court to review the Tenth Circuit’s December 2016 holding in Bandimere v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 5:25 pm
The new edition incorporates new developments through the Supreme Court’s 2021-22 term, including excerpts from United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:38 am
Maloney to consider whether members of Congress can sue to force disclosure of information from the General Services Administration. ] Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carnahan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:49 pm
” In 1971, the high court in Bivens v. [read post]