Search for: "Cross v. United States of America" Results 761 - 780 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
One can find in the Yugoslavia court cases many instances of criminal liability for wanton and disproportionate devastation, involving, say, a Serb paramilitary unit deliberately trashing a village. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm by The Legal Blog
Vijay Dutt & Anr.) this Court has accepted the stand that even a Doctor is authorised by a party can cross examine the complainant. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Patterson helped Warren appreciate the evils of America’s racial stratification system. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:47 pm
The Affair of the Sonic Weapons Attack  continues to spiral out of control as both the United States of America and the Republic of Cuba continue to pull old behaviors from their tool kits. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
South Africa, England), this does not appear to apply for the chrysotile industry in North America. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by PunditMom
   Scalia’s opinion addressed the procedural questions it had to and then swiftly and deftly in just a few pages, made it clear, yet again, that blind justice isn’t blind at all and, apparently, is on the side of big corporate political donors and the United States Chamber of Commerce. [read post]