Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
” Elsewhere in the Post, Barnes also has coverage of the government’s recent cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
Dukes, AT&T v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:07 am
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit hears oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
The case, EPA v. [read post]
Arizona District Court Certifies Class Of Lesbian And Gay State Employees In Denial Of Benefits Case
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
Dukes, the gender discrimination class action, also continues to generate commentary. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am
[This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post: States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Code § 3553(c), a sentencing court must state `the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:18 am
The first case of the new Term, Williams v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Garnett, Justice Scala, Religious Freedom, and the First Amendment, Notre Dame Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1637 (2016).Nuel Chinonyelum Oji, Obergefell v Hodges and the Problem of Judicial Legislation, (University of Nigeria Bar Journal(UNBJ) 3 (2016) 147).Catherine Jean Archibald, Transgender Bathroom Rights, (Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Forthcoming).Riley Fredrick, Marriage Equality: The Paralleled Progress between Public Approval… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:14 pm
Judge Posner then stated – and this is where Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:57 pm
Moreover, Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
And, in doing so, the panel explains how plaintiffs may still seek monetary damages under Rule 23(b)(2) after Dukes. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:48 am
That is exactly what happened in Picarella v. [read post]
