Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
However, the NRRA does not address nonaffiliated groups, and a number of states have taken the position that surplus lines insurance premium taxes should be allocated to each state where an RPG member resides. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
LAWSUITS: FANTASY V. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 9:41 pm
Finally, even had plaintiff provided notice to its broker prior to October 2006, notice to an insurance broker does not constitute notice to the liability carrier (see Security Mut. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 4:44 pm
Another source of information on compensation for loss of use can be found with the Texas Department of Insurance. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:08 pm
The Department of Labor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
State v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm
v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
The case was Baldwin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
In Operton v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
Burwell, No. 13-1540, and Reaching Souls Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am
Burwell v. [read post]
COA Opinion: Tax tribunal correctly held that a taxpayer’s appeal of a final assessment was untimely
1 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
In PIC Maintenance, Inc v Dept of Treasury, No. 298358, the Court of Appeals addressed whether a taxpayer’s appeal was timely and whether the tax tribunal had authority to issue a stay of collection proceedings. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Co. v Gillette Co., 64 NY2d 304, 310). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:56 am
A settlement of a disciplinary action should be memorialize in writingWinkler v Kingston Housing Auth., 259 AD2d 819A public employee who faces disciplinary charges may enter into a settlement agreement that disposes the charges, so long as the waiver is knowingly and intelligently undertaken and serves as the consideration for the curtailment of pending disciplinary proceedings [see Whitehead v State of New York Department of Mental Hygiene, 71 AD2d 653]. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Kulch v. [read post]
