Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
Clearing houses, also called central counterparties (CCP) are an important part of the regulatory reforms called for under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm
Pursuant to Section 1077 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the report covers (i) the evolution and current state of the private lending market, (ii) the characteristics of consumers of private student loans, (iii) consumer protections, including recent changes and possible gaps, (iv) fair lending compliance information currently available and its implications, and (v) statutory or legislative recommendations to improve consumer protections. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Supreme Court in Magner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
She stated that the SEC did give priority to the Dodd-Frank provisions with statutory deadlines, but the SEC has not de-prioritized D [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:17 pm
He based this finding on the words of Lord Osborne in H M Advocate v William Frederick Ian Beggs (No2) (2002 S.L.T. 139). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:34 am
In this case, the Senate report accompanying Dodd-Frank Section 929A stated that the intent of the amendment was to clarify Section 806. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:35 pm
Eastern States Construction Service, 2008 WL 2673300 (Del. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
” National Bank v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
See Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
See Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:13 pm
In March, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision on a motion for summary judgment in Dodd v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
Asadi v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:39 am
Asadi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Parks v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
The case was summarily affirmed by the the Supreme Court in SPTA v. [read post]
