Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY" Results 761 - 780 of 36,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:37 am
The decision otherwise was unanimous.The case is Hardt v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:14 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
(2) Does the high court's decision permit arbitration agreements to override the statutory right to bring representative claims under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
In the opinion, the Florida Supreme Court addressed the following question certified to it by the Fourth District: Does the Florida Supreme Court's Holding in Allstate Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Eric Goldman
Doe * Another Censorious Copyright Case Results In a Big Fee Shift–Inglewood v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick E. Knie
Fundamental Long-Term Care Holdings, LLC The post Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-Insureds – Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 2:50 pm by Barsumian Armiger
Continue Reading › The post Indiana Supreme Court Finds MCS-90 Does Not Apply to Wrongful Death Truck Crash Involving Truck Transporting Non-Hazardous Cargo Intrastate appeared first on Indiana Personal Injury Lawyer and Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog. [read post]