Search for: "Doe v. University of Michigan" Results 761 - 780 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Lawrence Rosenthal, Does Due Process Have an Original Meaning? [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
Bollinger, O’Connor wrote the majority opinion that was joined in full by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer, which upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s use of racial preferences in admissions decisions. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Mark Walsh
(Actually, the first act is Justice Sonia Sotomayor, fresh from the many rave notices she received for her stinging dissent in last week’s decision on Michigan’s ban on the use of race by public universities in their admissions process. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Defendants often rely in part on a study conducted by two professors at Michigan State University. [read post]
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]