Search for: "Does 1-32" Results 761 - 780 of 5,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 4:29 am
So they turned to Medicare and its 32 million seniors and disabled people who account for 1 in 4 prescriptions written every year. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 2:13 am by Eleonora Rosati
This was on the basis of the newly-enacted section 28B of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (‘CDPA’) which, since 1 October 2014, permits individuals to make personal copies of works (other than computer programs) that they have acquired lawfully and on a permanent basis for their own private use (see previous post here).My intentions of enjoying Tom Mison’s face this exciting and fast-paced TV show in full 32-inch-screen glory were,… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:50 pm
One could therefore understand why Trump might not approve of this use of the word he (inadvertently) coined simultaneously to (1) promote the sale of alcohol (a product that he does not care for) and (2) mock him (an activity which he positively despises).However, under what ground could he oppose its registration? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm by WIMS
The problem with ENIP's theory is that it does not reflect the fact that in the non-breach world, Unit 2 SNF, rather than Unit 1 SNF, would have been removed from Indian Point in 1998, when Consolidated Edison still owned the Indian Point facility. . . [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
The fact that D1 does not contain any figures does not hinder the skilled person from understanding the described method or from carrying it out.2.4 D1 discloses a method for dispensing pharmaceuticals upon production of a prescription by the purchaser (page 6, lines 6-8) providing a dispensing machine containing a stock of prescribed pharmaceuticals (page 6, lines 19-20) - i.e. restricted goods in the sense of claim 1 - with an audio communication link from the … [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:13 am by Thalia Kruger
On the matter of immunity the Constitutional Court found: “Zimbabwe’s agreement to be bound by the Tribunal Protocol, including article 32[on enforcement and execution], constitutes an express waiver in terms of section 3(1) of the Immunities Act. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Dickinson
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands Win to MLBPA and Aaron Judge In… [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 41.50(b), we enter NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION against: (1) claims 32, 43,and 44 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 9:30 am
That presumes that Governor DeSantis does not issue a line item veto on the amounts recommended in the Budget bill. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
   KNUT IP Management Ltd, on the other had contended an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]