Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 761 - 780 of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 8:07 am
 Nothing in the language of the Code or the Bankruptcy Rules makes a debtor's estimates of value binding, but this approach, by implication, does exactly that in the absence of a timely objection. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
§ 99-39-9 (1)(e) (2007), which legitimately questions the lethal injection protocol employed by the State of Mississippi. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2007, 1% of Americans makes 23.5% of all income. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
The following information does not take into consideration penalties for breath test/chemical test refusals. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm by Brad Wendel
  But does the law really permit the mailers with clear windows? [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:19 pm
Here are some of the posts: Where Does Ari Fleischer Fit In? [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:52 am
[1] David Kiley and David Welch, Why do GM and Chrysler Need Uncle Sam's Help? [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 6:41 am
And, then we way, ‘Why does this happen? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:36 pm by Jeralyn
Somehow, a court will find 12 jurors who claim not to have made their mind up (it always does, whether it's true is another matter.) [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 7:31 pm
Section 1-2.113 Standards for Considering Commutation Petitions A commutation of sentence reduces the period of incarceration; it does not imply forgiveness of the underlying offense, but simply remits a portion of the punishment. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 3:25 am by Becky
  On 18th March 2021, Inver House Distillers Limited applied to revoke the proprietors’ mark on the grounds of non-use under Sections 46(1)(a) and 46(1)(b) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:13 am
* Presumably the budget was to take effect January 1, 2011 and by not providing for the funding of the relevant positions, the Legislature was deemed to have “abolished them. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:47 pm
  Notice that this statement does not fall within one of the first four categories. [read post]