Search for: "Does 1-82" Results 761 - 780 of 1,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stefan Padfield
It is based on his recent paper, “Does Stakeholder Capitalism Have a (Viewpoint) Diversity Problem? [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:08 am
While this distinction does exist, its force is perhaps somewhat undermined by the fact that the fulcrum of Messer was s. 111A(2), which, unlike s. 82, makes no reference to the source of the restriction. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Although the affidavits by the unnamed Clients 1-5, who remained plaintiff’s clients, do not alone support the tortious interference claim, they shed light on the tactics to which defendants were apparently willing to resort, as does the affidavit by the Schwitzer firm’s former employee, which is consistent with those by Clients 1-5. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Section 7(1) provides: “Where a public authority is listed in Schedule 1 only in relation to information of a specified description, nothing in Parts 1 to V of this Act applies to any other information held by the authority” Schedule 1 contains a long list of bodies, persons and office-holders. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:51 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
 A-2915/S-2035 (Lagana, McKeon, Ciattarelli/Bateman, Barnes) - "Uniform Trust Code"ARTICLE 1 (3B:31-1 THROUGH 3B:31-12): This article provides the definitions and general provisions to be used throughout the bill, which would largely comprise a new chapter in Title 3B of the New Jersey Statutes. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:57 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
 A-2915/S-2035 (Lagana, McKeon, Ciattarelli/Bateman, Barnes) - "Uniform Trust Code"ARTICLE 1 (3B:31-1 THROUGH 3B:31-12): This article provides the definitions and general provisions to be used throughout the bill, which would largely comprise a new chapter in Title 3B of the New Jersey Statutes. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 363, 58 S.Ct. 872, 874, 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938).* * * Historically, federal sentencing—the function of determining the scope and extent of punishment—never has been thought to be assigned by the Constitution to the exclusive jurisdiction of any one of the three Branches of Government. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
-Dec. 1944, (2) violating Art. 82 of 1920 Articles of War in United States during Nov. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Cabinet Office rejected the request, invoking section 12(1) of FIPPA. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We hold that a party's failure to disclose its experts pursuant to CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i) prior to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness does not divest a court of the discretion to consider an affirmation or affidavit submitted by that party's experts in the context of a timely motion for summary judgment. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 6:11 am by Simon Lester
In 2004, I wrote the following article on the issue ‘TRIPs and Trademarks: The Case of Tobacco’, 3(1) World Trade Review (2004), 53 – 82. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Blogspot
(2) In particular, is it sufficient that, under national law and/or practice and/or under the collective agreements and/or contractual arrangements negotiated between employers and workers, the payment made enables and encourages the worker to take and to enjoy, in the fullest sense of these words, his or her annual leave; and does not involve any sensible risk that the worker will not do so? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Ryan Scoville
Figure 1: Prior Knowledge of Principal Languages Since 1980 One might fairly question the significance of this finding. [read post]