Search for: "Fisher v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2011, 7:02 pm
The unpublished NMCCA opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
United States, 434 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
On the twentieth anniversary of Justice Thomas’ confirmation to the highest court in the United States, USA Today has this “retrospective” piece on the work of the Silent Assassin. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
United States, and Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Intellectual Property Office (IPO) patent examiner Nigel Hanley opened the proceedings with a concise account of how the IPO's version of Peer-to-Patent (P2P) was intended to work; UCL-and-IPKat Matt Fisher then gave a candid account of the P2P experiences of the United States and Australia. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
” Fisher v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Fisher, EN1 Bert E. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:01 pm
I posted earlier this spring on the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
